• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    A method for modifying the permeability of underground formations and more particularly, a method for reducing the water permeability of such formations. In particular, the invention relates to a method of clogging natural or induced fractures in hydrocarbon-producing field formations, especially in lime reservoirs, by enzymatically induced calcium carbonate precipitation to reduce water production and other aqueous liquids from the underground formations.
    公开号:DK201870062A1
    申请号:DKP201870062
    申请日:2018-01-29
    公开日:2018-03-05
    发明作者:Thomas Lundgaard；Mikkel Agerbaek；Jan Larsen
    申请人:Maersk Olie & Gas；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    < 1 θ> DENMARK < 1 °> DK 2018 70062 A1
    < 12 > PATENT APPLICATION
    Patent and
    Trademark Office (51)
    Int C: C 09 K 8/506 (2006.01)
    C 09 K 8/60 (2006.01) (21) Application Number: PA 2018 70062 (22) Filing Date: 2018-01-29 (24) Running Day: 2008-03-11 (41) Aim. available: 2018-01-29 (62) Stock Application No: PA2009 00354 (30) Priority: 2007-04-03 US 07006901.8 2007-04-03 US 60 / 921,629 (71) Applicant: Maersk Oil and GAS A / S, America Plads 29, st., 2100 Copenhagen 0, Denmark (72) Inventor: Thomas Lundgaard, Willemoesgade 5.1th., 8200 Århus N, Denmark Mikkel Agerbæk, Poppelvej 17, 8600 Silkeborg, Denmark
    Jan Larsen, Borgergade 25, st.th., 1300 Copenhagen K, Denmark (74) Plenipotentiary: Zacco Denmark A / S, Arne Jacobsens Allé 15, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark (54) Name: Clogging of high permeability areas in underground Formations (57) Abstract:
    A method for modifying the permeability of underground formations and more particularly, a method for reducing the water permeability of such formations. In particular, the invention relates to a method for clogging natural or induced fractures in hydrocarbon-producing field formations, especially in lime reservoirs, by enzymatically induced calcium carbonate precipitation to reduce water production and other aqueous liquids from the underground formations.
    To be continued ...
    DK 2018 70062 A1
    Figure 4
    DK 2018 70062 A1
    Clogging of high permeability areas in underground formations
    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
    The present invention relates to a method for modifying the permeability of underground formations and more particularly to a method for reducing the water permeability of such formations. In particular, the invention relates to a method of clogging natural or induced fractures in hydrocarbon-producing field formations, especially in lime reservoirs, by enzymatically induced calcium carbonate precipitation to reduce production of water and other aqueous liquids from the underground formations.
    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
    Hydrocarbons (for example, oil and gas) are generally recovered from underground formations by drilling a wellbore into the formation and extracting the hydrocarbon.
    Factors affecting the rate of hydrocarbon production and therefore the productivity of the well are i.a. the pressure in the formation and the ratio of hydrocarbon to water produced from the formation.
    Production of water and other aqueous liquids from the underground formations is a common phenomenon, especially in the case of old wells, and a certain level of water production is actually needed for efficient hydrocarbon extraction. For example, the water produced may be water injected into the well, or especially through another
    DK 2018 70062 A1 water injector well a piece from the producing well to promote hydrocarbon recovery.
    When the hydrocarbons are extracted from a formation, water and aqueous fluids tend to move through the pore system in the formation and into the wellbore where they are produced together with the hydrocarbon.
    It is known that excessive production of water and other aqueous liquids (i.e., production of more water and / or aqueous liquids than necessary for efficient production of hydrocarbon) from wells presents a number of problems, such as lowering the rate of hydrocarbon production and formation of scales on the downhole. equipment (for example, pipelines, valves, sand screens, etc.) as well as surface facilities and furthermore that repair or replacement of such equipment can only be carried out during periods of production shut down, which has a significant economic impact on the production process. Excessive production of water further increases the cost of hydrocarbon recovery in a form suitable for transport and / or further refining. In particular, the overproduction of water necessitates the use of expensive equipment to separate the water and other aqueous liquids from the hydrocarbon. The costs associated with the disposal of produced water in an environmentally safe manner cause further economic disadvantages.
    In hydrocarbon producing formations, the amount of water produced typically increases over the life of the well and eventually reaches a point where the cost of handling the volume of water produced during hydrocarbon production becomes greater than the value of the hydrocarbon recovered. At this point, the wellbore can be described as '' watered down '' (ie it becomes essentially uneconomical to exploit). Although there may still be hydrocarbon material left in a '' diluted ''
    DK 2018 70062 A1 well reservoir zone, it can thus no longer be extracted economically.
    A number of methods for controlling water production from underground formations have been proposed. These include processes designed to block pores or channels in a formation, for example, by gelation using polymeric materials such as polyvinyl alcohol and polyacrylic acid. Another method that has been proposed involves the introduction of a barrier, such as a concrete resin, adjacent to the wellbore to prevent water from moving into the bore. Such treatments may in some cases provide a desired level of water control by effectively blocking water-producing channels and pores. However, these methods are not selective for water-producing channels and also tend to block the channels and pores that may give rise to hydrocarbon production.
    Recently, methods for obtaining selective water control techniques have been proposed. These methods typically involve introducing a composition comprising a hydrophilic polymer (e.g., a polyacrylamide) into the formation. Although the size of the polymer inhibits the movement of fluids (for example, water) in the formation, it is believed that the hydrophilicity of the polymer gives the desired selectivity. More specifically, the hydrophilic nature of the polymeric materials is believed to preferentially penetrate into the channels and pores of the formation containing high water levels.
    However, the use of hydrophilic polymers, such as polyacrylamides, has its drawbacks. One disadvantage is that the polymers often have only limited retention time in the formation. Despite suggestions for improving their retention (for example, use of organosilicon compound as described in
    DK 2018 70062 A1
    GB-A-2399364), it is still the case that formations often have to be re-treated with additional polymeric material after a relatively short period of time. Also, it is not uncommon for a reduction in hydrocarbon production to be associated with the use of such polymers, since at least a portion of these are primarily located in hydrocarbon-producing channels or pores, thereby blocking hydrocarbon production (e.g., oil).
    A further disadvantage associated with the use of polymeric materials for controlling water production arises from the fact that they are often at least partially unstable at high temperatures (e.g., higher than 110 ° C) as well as in acids and strong saline solutions commonly used in hydrocarbon. Exposure to such temperatures and / or chemicals can cause the polymers to decompose and / or degrade, thereby blocking their blocking effect. If this happens, the formation must then be re-processed, which further increases the cost. Furthermore, polyacrylamide is potentially harmful to the environment (the acrylamide monomer produced by degradation of polyacrylamide is a nerve toxin).
    WO 2005/124099 provides a method for controlling water in an underground formation which comprises contacting the formation with a water control treatment agent comprising an organosilane in an amount effective to reduce at least a portion of the formation's water permeability. WO 2005/124099 further provides a method for clogging or sealing an underground formation.
    WO 2005/124099 further discloses that enzyme systems are suitable for use in a method of sealing or clogging a
    DK 2018 70062 A1 aqueous (e.g., oil-depleted) underground formation, which comprises contacting the formation with a water control treatment agent comprising an enzyme and substrate, therefore, in an amount effective to reduce the formation's permeability.
    These systems comprise an enzyme and a substrate for the enzyme, where the effect of the enzyme on the substrate results in the precipitation or deposition of a material that effectively inhibits fluid flow through the formation. The material that is deposited or deposited in the formation can be produced by a compound present in the rock formation prior to the introduction of the enzyme system. Alternatively, a suitable compound, in addition to the enzyme and substrate, may be introduced into the well.
    Suitable enzymes include enzymes that remain active under the conditions (temperature, pressure, etc.) found in the underground formation to be treated. Typically, these will be water soluble. An urease (EC
    3.5.1.5) is stated to be a preferred enzyme. It can be isolated from any plant, bacterial or fungal source. Optionally, it may be chemically modified provided it retains its desired catalytic activity. Examples of suitable ureases include thermophilic or thermostable ureases, for example, those isolated from Jack bean. Suitable ureas are said to be commercially available from Sigma. A particularly preferred urease is Urease Canavalia ensiformis (Jack Bean), which can be obtained from Sigma under Product no. U1500.
    Suitable enzyme-substrate combinations are ureases in combination with urea, which will typically be used in conjunction with an aqueous solution which, upon contact with the enzyme-substrate system, is capable of forming a precipitate which clogs or seals a formation's pore system. A suitable solution for use with urease /
    DK 2018 70062 A1 urea is an aqueous solution containing a salt of Ca, for example calcium chloride.
    Urea's effect on urea generates ammonia and CO2. In an aquatic solution, CO2 is hydrated to carbonates (H2CO3, HCO3 'and CO3 2 ', depending on pH). In contact with CaCU, the carbonates generate CaCO3. WO 2005/124099 states that the calcium carbonate is believed to be effective in inhibiting fluid flow through the formation.
    U.S. Patent No. 5,730,873 discloses a method for time-delayed precipitation of a solid metal phase from a low pH metal salt solution comprising addition to the metal solution of a substrate such as an amide and an enzyme such as an amidase which will react with the substrate which causes an increase in pH by reaction of the substrate with the enzyme.
    The rise in pH causes the metal to separate from the solution. The precipitated metal is useful for depositing metal hydroxides to provide sorbent material useful for removing contamination from groundwater.
    It is disclosed that the substrate may be urea and that the low pH iron solution which is the source of urease may be Jack bean flour which appears to be more resistant to blending than purified urease.
    U.S. Patent No. 4,002,204 discloses a process in which a cationic emulsion containing asphalt and a pH-increasing reactant (subsequently breaking the emulsion) is injected into an underground soil formation to clog the soil formation, and using as the pH-increasing reactant of a mixture, consisting essentially of urea and urease.
    DK 2018 70062 A1
    In the Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 2003, page 10, Nemati & Voordouw described that biologically formed calcium carbonate can form a durable blockage for increased oil recovery. Purified urease enzyme and urease enzyme produced bacteriologically were tested in a reaction medium containing urea and calcium chloride dihydrate. It was found that the yield of enzymatically produced calcium carbonate was significantly higher than that of bacteriologically produced.
    Therefore, there is a continuing need for alternative (e.g., improved) methods for controlling water flow in underground formations, especially during hydrocarbon production (e.g., oil) from a well, and in particular for methods capable of reducing the hydrocarbon recovery produced. water volume.
    SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
    The invention is further described with reference to the drawing:
    Figure 1. Clogging material performance at various reactant and enzyme levels. The three columns at each sample ID represent 2 and 24 hours reaction time. In the figure text, protein refers to the total amount of Jack bean flour.
    Figure 2. Clogging material performance at various reactant and enzyme levels. The four columns at each sample ID represent 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours of reaction time. In the figure text, protein refers to the total amount of Jack bean flour.
    DK 2018 70062 A1
    Figure 3. Low-pressure forcing set-up mounted on a sample of a piece of limestone drill bit. The schematic drawing on the right shows the principle of the design.
    Figure 4. Set-up to measure clogging capability. An upright cylindrical reservoir in the form of a tube containing water control treatment agent (10 ml) was connected at the lower end to a steel tube with 2 mm internal 0. The steel tube was bent and formed a U-bend. The set-up was designed in such a way that the precipitated crystals would settle in the lower part of tubes where the tube was bent, narrowing the opening to half the area.
    Figure 5. Clogging strength measurements on the test set-up shown in Figure 4 using CaCl2-2H2O (250 g / l), urea (110 g / l) and
    Jack bean flour (25 g / l) as the water control agent (standard) and standard with added bentonite (20 g / l), and standard where Jack bean flour is sieved to contain large grains (> 125 μιτι).
    Figure 6. Representative size distribution of particles in the water control means having the following composition CaCl2-2H 2 O (250 g / l), urea (110 g / l) and Jackbønnemel (25 g / l), as measured by laser diffraction.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION
    In one aspect, the present invention provides a method for sealing or clogging natural or induced fractures in subterranean formations using a water control treatment agent which comprises contacting the formation with the water control treatment agent comprising a water control treatment agent.
    Therefore, in an amount effective to reduce the permeability of the formation, the enzyme is introduced into the formation together with a substrate therefor, and the enzyme is added as a flour by a plant of the family Leguminosae (Fabaceae).
    Injection of water into oil reservoirs (water flooding) is common for increased oil recovery. When water is injected into a reservoir, the flow is preferably directed into high permeability zones from which oil has already been recovered during primary production. The excessive production of water can be controlled by selectively clogging high permeability areas in the reservoir by adding a water control treatment agent containing an enzyme and a substrate therefor. The enzyme will react with the substrate to form a product. This product must be capable of reacting with compounds present in the subterranean formation and / or the water control treatment agent for reducing the permeability, for example, by precipitating a compound.
    In one embodiment, the underground formation is a horizontal (e.g., oil-depleted) underground formation.
    In another embodiment, the underground formation is a hydrocarbon-producing field formation.
    In another embodiment, the water control agent further comprises a precipitating compound which forms a heavily soluble compound with the reaction product of the enzyme and substrate.
    Precipitates may be metal salts such as those selected from one or more salts of the following metals: aluminum, barium, cadmium, calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, magnesium, manganese,
    DK 2018 70062 A1 mercury, nickel, strontium, silver, tin, and / or zinc. These metals form heavily soluble salts, such as cabonates and hydroxides. A heavily soluble compound would have a solubility constant K sp <0.001 and / or a solubility of less than 50 g / l, for example less than 30 g / l, or less than 10 g / l, or less than 100 mg / l.
    In another embodiment, the water treating agent is added as a solution or suspension.
    In one embodiment, the source of the enzyme is soybean meal and / or Jack bean flour. Soybean meal and Jack bean meal are a source of raw urease, and are a cost-effective source of urease compared to purified urease.
    In another embodiment, the enzyme is selected from a urease (EC 3.5.1.5) or amidase (EC 3.5.1.4). The urease or amidase may be crude or purified.
    Urea's activity should be above 1 unit / l water control treatment agent, and typically it is from 1 to approx. 1,000,000 units / l, or from approx. 500 to approx.
    600,000 units / l, or from approx. 1000 to approx. 300,000 units / l, or from approx. 2000 to approx. 100 000 units / l, or from approx. 5000 to approx. 40,000 units / l. When urease is used as the enzyme, the substrate for the enzyme is urea.
    A suitable substrate is urea since urease cleaves urea into ammonium and carbonate and the carbonate can react with the calcium ions present in calcium-rich reservoirs in particular.
    Calcareous reservoirs often contain a source of calcium ions near the point of saturation. But additional metal salts selected from one or more salts
    DK 2018 70062 A1 of the following metals: aluminum, barium, cadmium, calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, magnesium, manganese, mercury, nickel, strontium, silver, tin, and / or zinc, can be added to further improve the reduction of formation permeability. The only prerequisite for the salt is that it must be at least partially soluble at the pH of the water control agent and be able to precipitate as a salt, for example as a carbonate or hydroxide.
    In another embodiment, the method is performed at a target pressure of from 0 to 300 bar.
    In another embodiment, the water control treatment means comprises a stabilizer. Such stabilizers may be proteins such as skimmed milk powder.
    Inclusion of an enzyme stabilizing protein in the clogging fluid significantly increases clogging material formation. Even at a low concentration of 5 mg / l, this can increase the formation yield up to three times.
    In another embodiment, the pH of the water control agent is adjusted to a pH in the range of 7 to 9, such as a pH of 7.5 to 8.5, e.g. 8th
    In another embodiment, the water control treating agent comprises at least one additive to improve clogging strength and structure. This may be one or more of the following: cationic, anionic, neutral polymers, fibers, microparticles, polymerized aluminum or surfactants. In another embodiment, bentonite is added.
    DK 2018 70062 A1
    In one aspect, the present invention provides a method for sealing or clogging natural or induced fractures in subterranean formations using a water control treatment agent, comprising contacting the formation with the water control treatment agent comprising an enzyme and a substrate, amount effective to reduce the permeability of the formation, wherein the enzyme is introduced into the formation together with a substrate therefor, and where the enzyme is added as a flour by a plant of the Leguminosae (Fabaceae) family and where the water control treatment agent contains substantially no asphalt.
    In one aspect, the present invention provides a water control treatment agent comprising a flour of a plant of the Leguminosae (Fabaceae) family and a substrate for urease.
    In one embodiment, the water control treatment agent further comprises a precipitate compound and / or an additive to improve the strength and structure of the precipitate material.
    In another embodiment, the water control agent comprises Jack bean flour, urea and / or calcium chloride.
    In another embodiment, the water control treatment agent comprises Jack bean flour (30,000-50,000 units / L), urea (88-132 g / L), and / or
    CaCl2-2H 2 O (200-300 g / l), and / or bentonite (15-25 g / l).
    As used herein, the term permeability refers to the ability of a porous medium to transmit a liquid. It therefore provides a measure of a formation's resistance to a fluid (for example
    Water and / or hydrocarbon) flow through the pores and channels that form its structure. Thus, hydrocarbon permeability means the ability of a porous medium, such as an underground formation, to transmit hydrocarbon (for example, oil), and water permeability ”means the corresponding ability to transmit water.
    The inventors have found that the specific type of urease enzyme found in bean flour achieves up to 50% higher clogging material formation compared to highly refined enzyme products.
    Without wishing to be bound by this theory, it is believed that bean flour is a fully functional and better alternative to highly refined enzymes with added skimmed milk powder. This is due to the high content of urease in bean flour and the natural stabilizing effect of raw bean flour.
    EXAMPLES
    Example 1
    Enzymatic formation of CaCOs
    Calcium carbonate formation was investigated using a solution of CaCl 2 of a Type IX urease with 82 800 units / g extracted from
    Jack beans (1 g / l).
    DK 2018 70062 A1
    Three solutions were tested in acid-washed glass tubes for 8 days, with each tube containing reactants to precipitate a maximum of 20 g CaCCb per liter when all urea was converted to carbonate.
    Solution A. Urea (12 g / l), CaCl 2 -2H 2 O (30 g / l), stabilizer (4 g / l), and urease (15 mg / l) (1242 units / l)
    Solution B-. Urea (12 g / l), CaCl 2 -2H 2 O (30 g / l), stabilizer (4 g / l), and urease (10 mg / l) (828 units / l).
    Solution C: Urea 12 g / l), CaCl 2 -2H 2 O (30 g / l), and urease (10 mg / l) (828 units / l) (without stabilizer).
    The glass tubes were allowed to react at 25 ° C without stirring and open to the open air, and samples were taken at regular intervals. The sample tubes were centrifuged at 2 480 G for 10 minutes, the supernatant discarded, followed by wiping of the tubes at 70 ° C. The precipitate was analyzed for weight loss due to acid-soluble precipitate by drying the dried precipitate 20 before and after treatment with 36% hydrochloric acid.
    In all test solutions, a white precipitate was formed in visible amounts after the first day. Analyzes of the precipitating materials were performed at different times, and the results are shown in Table 1.
    DK 2018 70062 A1
    Table 1. Precipitation material in grams and calcium content (grams CaCO 3 ) per liter of clogging solution before and after dilution of precipitation material with acid
    reactiontime(Hours) Solution A Solution B Solution C precipitationnings-material(G / in) Acid-solublecalcium(G / in) precipitationnings-material(G / in) Acid-solublecalcium(G / in) precipitationnings-material(G / in) Acid-solublecalcium(G / in) 0 1.4 0.5 1.2 0.4 0.6 0.5 18 8.9 6.8 6.8 4.8 3.5 third, 24 10.7 7.8 7.9 6.0 6.0 5.9 48 15.8 12.8 12.4 10.0 7.8 7.6 96 19.3 16.3 15.6 12.8 13.7 12.3 212 20.4 16.3 19.9 n.d. 13 11.9
    The precipitated amount increased continuously over eight days, and up to
    80% of the potential amount of calcium carbonate precipitated. It can be seen that the skimmed milk powder was precipitated with the calcium carbonate.
    Example 2
    High permeability sand column clogging
    Clogging tests were performed using a high permeability sand column of 128 mm height and 29 mm diameter with a total volume of 85 ml packed with acid washed and calcined sea sand (Merck) with a grain size of 100-300 µm. The column had a porosity of 35%. Dense packing was ensured by packing the sand as a thick sludge while knocking on the glass wall. The column was rinsed with
    DK 2018 70062 A1 demineralized water, and the hydraulic conductivity was measured by a method of both '' constant head '' and '' falling head ''.
    Clogging Method A (about 3 pore volumes) was injected into the sand column which was then closed at both ends and allowed to react.
    After 24 hours, the sand column was rinsed with demineralized water and hydraulic conductivity was measured. This procedure was repeated two more times with clogging solution A, the only difference being that clogging solution A in the third injection contained the double amount of urease (30 mg / L). The results can be seen in Table 2.
    Table 2. Hydraulic conductivity measured using falling head and constant head methods after three injections with water control agent solution A.
    reactiontime(Hours) '' Fallinghead "(M / sec) relativechangeK / Ko '' Constanthead "(M / sec) relativechangeK / Ko Calculated average permeability(Darcy) 0 Start 1.5 * 10 4 100% 1.5 * 10 4 100% 15.4 25 2. injection 1.2 * 10 4 79% 1.3 * 10 4 87% 12.8 49 3. injection 1.1 * 10 -4 73% 1.1 * 10 -4 77% 11.6 74 End 9.4 * 10 5 63% 8.4 * 10 5 57% 9.3
    The results show that the water control treatment solution S could reduce the hydraulic conductivity to 60% of the initial value.
    Example 3
    Effect of stabilizer
    Skimmed milk powder (Arla Foods, Viby, Denmark) is tested as a stabilizer for purified urease (Calzyme labs, CA, USA, 150,000 U / g) and compared with both purified urease without skimmed milk powder and
    DK 2018 70062 A1 urease contained in Jack bean flour (VWR International, Denmark, 1 700 U / g) without skimmed milk powder.
    Water control treatment agents are prepared according to Table 3 in demineralized 5 water and the clogging material formation is measured as dry matter after drying sediment at 70 ° C after centrifugation for 10 minutes at 2 480 G.
    Table 3. Effect on clogging formation by adding different amounts of stabilizing skimmed milk powder to the water control agent containing purified urease, compared to water control agent without skimmed milk powder and where the source of urease is added as Jack bean flour.
    CaCl 2 (g / i) Urea(G / in) urease(coal) protein(G / in) foulingmaterial(G / in) 2 h 24 h 90 48 8.5 5 33 59 .i Έ I o <1) 90 72 8.5 5 33 64 «§ E o ~ -Q Q. 150 72 8.5 5 44 80 150 48 8.5 5 38 71 + φ «Λ -— · 100 60 8.3 10 20 57 ureaseSkummtmmælkpowder(proteir 120 72 8.3 15 28 60 150 60 8.3 10 31 58 180 48 8.3 5 27 44 ureasenothingmilkprotein 120 72 8.3 0 10 30 180 48 8.3 0 18 16 150 60 8.3 0 19 16 100 60 8.3 0 13 26
    DK 2018 70062 A1
    Example 4
    Optimization of the water control treatment agent
    The optimization of the water control agent has been attempted by testing the response to enzyme concentration, calcium chloride and urea levels, as well as added enzyme stabilizer and reaction time.
    Water control treatment agents are prepared and analyzed by example
    3. The results are shown in Figure 1.
    Formation performance increases dramatically compared to Example 1, and the reaction time to form precipitate material is improved from 6-8 days to well under 24 hours.
    The optimizations shown in Figure 1 show the potential for further improvements in reaction rate and process scope. Further optimization was therefore attempted.
    These results are shown in Figure 2, which shows, among other things, clogging material formation of more than 100 g / l after less than 12 hours, and up to 180 g / l of precipitating material can be formed within 24 hours. Furthermore, 70 g / l of precipitate or more is already present after 3 hours.
    Example 5
    The influence of pressure
    DK 2018 70062 A1
    Impact of static pressure on water control agent process is investigated to ensure that enzyme inhibition does not occur when pressure approaches reservoir conditions.
    Pressure tests are performed by placing bulk reactors with water control treatment agents in a special temperature controlled reaction chamber with nitrogen pressure. The water control agent included: CaCl 2 -2H 2 O (250 g / l), urea (110 g / l), and Jack bean flour (5, 10 and 20 g / l).
    Tests were performed at 25 ° C and at the following target pressures: 0, 55 and 115 bar, with a reaction time of 4 hours.
    No indications of reduced pressure were found at the elevated temperatures investigated. Reaction with 5, 10 and 20 g / L Jack bean flour yielded 40-45 g / L, 55-60 g / L, and 90-100 g / L precipitate after reaction for 4 hours.
    Example 6
    Impact of temperature and pressure
    It was relevant to verify the function of the enzymatic process at temperatures under reservoir conditions. The combined effect of temperature and pressure was also investigated.
    Temperature and pressure tests are performed by placing bulk reactors with water control treatment agents in a special temperature controlled pressure chamber under nitrogen pressure. The water control treatment agent included
    CaCl 2 -2H 2 O (250 g / L), urea (110 g / L), and Jack bean flour (20 g / L).
    DK 2018 70062 A1
    Tests were performed at 25 ° C and 80 ° C with target pressures of 0 and 100 bar. The reaction time was 4 hours.
    Raising the temperature to 80 ° C increased the yield of precipitation material by 30-40%. At this temperature and at both 0 and 100 bar target pressure, a precipitation material of 130-140 g / l was obtained.
    Example 7
    Clogging of samples of limestone drill cores
    Preliminary fracture clogging was performed in samples of Halfdan drill cores of limestone.
    Low pressure forceps mounted on a specially cut and polished piece of Halfdan drill bit of limestone with drilled holes in sizes up to 2 mm were used for the tests (Figure 3). Nitrogen was used to transport and put the water control treatment agent under pressure.
    Water Control treatment agent comprised CaCl2-2H 2 O (250 g / l), urea (110 g / L), and Jackbønnemel (25 g / l).
    The water control treatment agent was injected and allowed to react for 24 hours to provide a blockage that maintained target pressure of up to 2 bar.
    DK 2018 70062 A1
    Example 8
    Test system for measuring efficacy and clogging strength
    A test system for a model fracture was set up as depicted in Figure 4. An upright cylindrical reservoir in the form of a tube containing water control treatment agent (10 ml) was connected at the lower end to a steel tube with 2 mm internal 0. The steel tube was bent and formed a bend . The set-up was designed in such a way that the precipitated crystals would settle in the lower part of the tube where the tube was bent, narrowing the opening to half the area. The clogging position was confirmed by visual inspection after cutting the tube.
    Water control treatment agent (10 ml) was poured into the reservoir and left for 20 hours. Then, the rest of the reservoir was filled with water and the system was observed for any flow through the clogging as a measure of the clogging's effectiveness. A gradually increased pressure was then applied across the reservoir and the pressure needed to force fluid through the system was used as a measure of clogging strength.
    The majority of the experiments were carried out at room temperature (25 ° C). Experiments conducted at elevated temperatures (40 ° C and 70 ° C) showed no effect of temperature on clogging ability.
    The effectiveness of the blockage is the observed flow through the blockage compared to unobstructed flow of water through the system. It turned out that even weak blockages (which could withstand less than 0.1 bar of target pressure) reduced the flow through the system.
    DK flow 70062 A1 a factor of over 100 000. No flow was observed through the more durable blockages.
    It can be concluded that the precipitated calcium carbonate crystals form a very effective clogging that completely stops water flow.
    Example 9
    Tilstopninqstyrke
    Using the described in Example 8 tilstopningsstyrken model system was evaluated using a water control treatment agent comprising CaCl2-2H 2 O (250 g / l), urea (110 g / L), and
    Jack bean flour (25 g / l).
    Repeated clogging strength tests using this recipe exhibited a great natural variation attributed to the randomness of crystal precipitation and packing. In half of the measurements very weak blockages were formed (<0.1 bar target pressure), in the other half blockages were formed that withstand target pressure of 1-3 bar. To use the clogging strength test for comparison purposes it was necessary to make repeated measurements.
    It is believed that the size of the precipitated crystals increases when crystal I isation initiators, such as large grains of Jack bean flour or bentonite crystals, are present. To investigate this assumption, clogging strength tests were performed on water control agents containing either large grains of Jack bean flour without bentonite or ordinary Jack bean flour with bentonite. The results are shown in Figure 5.
    DK 2018 70062 A1
    Blockages made from crystal containing initiators also showed a great natural variation. However, eight repeated measurements showed that adding bentonite (20 g / l) to the water control treatment agent increased the average clogging strength from 1.0 to 2.8 bar of target pressure.
    Example 10
    Particle size measurement
    The size of crystals formed is a parameter of clogging efficiency, as large particles are important for forming durable clogging. Furthermore, the size distribution is expected to be important, as some width of the distribution will favor the packing and bonding of the clogging to an impermeable structure. Addition of polymers or other additives is expected to result in larger crystals and / or aggregates. The following parameters were changed:
    Table 4. Parameters changed in attempt to obtain larger particle sizes.
    Changed parameters Changes Temperature Calcium Chloride Urea Mg 2+ Addition Fe 2+ Addition Size Separated Jack Bean Flour Addition of Crystallization Initiator (Bentonite) 20 and 69 ° C -20%; + 20%; +45% -20%; + 20%; +80% Mg 2+ : Ca 2+ = 1:10; 1: 100; 1: 1000 Fe 2+ : Ca 2+ = 1:10; 1: 100; 1: 1000 36-63 μηη and> 125 μηη +20 g / L
    The size distribution of the precipitated crystals was measured with laser diffraction using a Malvern MastersizerX (long bench) equipped with a 1000 mm lens. Sampling was performed after dilution
    DK 2018 70062 A1 with demineralized water. Particles larger than 2 mm cannot be measured with this laser diffraction. As some of the samples contained larger crystal aggregates than 2 mm, the contents of large aggregates (> 1 mm) were quantified by screening the clogging fluid on a 1 mm sieve, with smaller crystals and weak aggregates being rinsed with demineralized water followed by wiping and weighing the screenings. .
    Mean particle size and size distribution were taken as the width of the distribution curve at half height. Figure 6 shows the size distribution of the water control treatment agent comprising:
    CaCl2-2H2O (250 g / l), urea (110 g / l) and Jack bean flour (25 g / l) after reaction for 20 hours at 69 ° C. Subsequent optimizations use this reference composition as well as reaction times and temperature as the reference point. The results are shown in Table. 4th
    Table 4. Parameters changed in attempt to obtain larger particles
    Changed Parameter meansize(Μηη) particlesize range(Pm) Contents of larger units (> 1 mm)(G / in) "Reference Composition" 72 20-480 2.3 -20% CaCl 2 200 70-900 14 + 20% CaCl 2 90 55-190 1 +45% CaCl 2 70 35-175 5 -20% urea 225 105-700 15 +20% urea 130 30-550 21 + 80% urea 70 40-110 3 Mg 2+ : Ca 2+ (1: 1000) 190 100-1000 21 Mg 2+ : Ca 2+ (1: 100) 200 50-800 15 Mg 2+ : Ca 2+ (1:10) 100 20-650 4 Fe 2+ : Ca 2+ (1: 1000) 60 20-115 1 Fe 2+ : Ca 2+ (1: 100) 62 30-110 0 Fe 2+ : Ca 2+ (1:10) 80 20-750 0.5 Jack bean flour (36-63 μιτι) 90 25-450 2 Jack bean flour (> 125 μιτι) 580 400-1100 21 + 20 g / l bentonite 130 60-850 67
    DK 2018 70062 A1
    embodiments
    A method of sealing or clogging natural or induced fractures in underground formations, comprising contacting the formation with a water control treating agent comprising the enzyme urease, the substrate uric acid, and a stabilizer in an amount effective to reduce the permeability of the formation. , characterized in that the stabilizing agent is Jack bean flour comprising urease and that the enzyme urease is the urease contained in the Jack bean flour.
    The method of embodiment 1, wherein the underground formation contains a precipitating compound which forms a heavily soluble compound with the reaction product of the enzyme and substrate.
    The method of embodiment 1 or 2, wherein the water control agent further comprises a precipitate compound which forms a heavily soluble compound with the reaction product of the enzyme and substrate.
    Process according to any of embodiments 1-3, characterized by a clogging of more than 100 g / l after less than 12 hours.
    A process according to any one of embodiments 1-4, wherein the precipitating compound is a metal salt selected from one or more salts of the following metals: aluminum, barium, cadmium, calcium, chromium,
    DK 2018 70062 A1 cobalt, copper iron, lead, magnesium, manganese, mercury, nickel, strontium, silver, tin and zinc.
    Process according to any of embodiments 1-5, wherein the process is carried out at a temperature of from 20 ° C to the boiling point of the reaction mixture at the prevailing temperature and pressure of the reaction site.
    A method according to any one of embodiments 1-6, wherein the method is carried out at a target pressure of 0 to 100 bar.
    A method according to any one of embodiments 1-7, wherein the pH of the water control treatment agent is adjusted to a pH in the range of 7 to 9, such as a pH of 7.5 to 8.5, for example a pH of approx. 8th
    A method according to any one of embodiments 1-8, wherein the water control treatment agent comprises at least one additive to improve the strength and structure of the clogging.
    The process of embodiment 9, wherein the at least one additive comprises one or more of the following: cationic, anionic, neutral polymers, fibers, microparticles, polymerized aluminum or surfactants.
    The process of embodiment 10, wherein the at least one additive comprises bentonite.
    The method of embodiment 1, wherein the underground formation is a hydrocarbon-producing field formation.
    DK 2018 70062 A1
    A method according to Embodiment 1, wherein the underground formation is an aqueous (e.g. oil-deposited) underground formation.
    A water control treatment agent comprising a urease enzyme, an enzyme stabilizer, and a substrate for the urease enzyme, characterized in that the enzyme stabilizer is Jack bean flour and that the urease enzyme is contained in the Jack bean flour and that the substrate is urine substance.
    A water control treatment agent according to embodiment 14, further comprising a precipitating compound and / or an additive for improving the strength and structure of the precipitating material.
    A water control treating agent according to any of embodiments 14-15, further comprising a partially soluble calcium salt.
    A water control treating agent according to any of embodiments 14-16, comprising Jack bean flour (30,000,00050,000 units / L), urea (88-132 g / L), and / or CaCl 2 -2H 2 O (200-300 g / l). l), and / or bentonite (15-25 g / l).
    DK 2018 70062 A1
    权利要求:
    Claims (13)
    [1]
    claims:
    A method of sealing or clogging natural or induced fractures in underground formations comprising contacting the formation with a water control treatment agent comprising the enzyme urease, the substrate urea, and a stabilizer in an amount effective to reduce the formation permeability. , characterized in that the stabilizing agent is Jack bean flour comprising urease and that the enzyme urease is the urease contained in the Jack bean flour, and that the water control treatment agent contains substantially no asphalt.
    [2]
    The method of claim 1, wherein the underground formation contains a precipitating compound which forms a heavily soluble compound with the reaction product of the enzyme and substrate.
    [3]
    The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein the water control agent further comprises a precipitate compound which forms a heavily soluble compound with the reaction product of the enzyme and substrate.
    [4]
    The method of claim 1, wherein the Jack bean meal has a particle size of> 125 µm.
    [5]
    A process according to any one of claims 1-4, wherein the precipitating compound is a metal salt selected from one or more salts of the following metals: aluminum, barium, cadmium, calcium, chromium,
    DK 2018 70062 A1 cobalt, copper, iron, lead, magnesium, manganese, mercury, nickel, strontium, silver, tin and zinc.
    [6]
    A process according to any one of claims 1-5, wherein the process is carried out at a temperature of from 20 ° C to the boiling point of the reaction mixture at the prevailing temperature and pressure of the reaction site.
    [7]
    A method according to any one of claims 1-6, wherein the method is carried out at a target pressure of 0 to 100 bar.
    [8]
    A method according to any one of claims 1-7, wherein the pH of the water control treatment agent is adjusted to a pH in the range of 7 to 9, such as a pH of 7.5 to 8.5, for example a pH of approx. 8th
    [9]
    A method according to any one of claims 1-8, wherein the water control treatment agent comprises at least one additive to improve clogging strength and structure.
    [10]
    The process of claim 9, wherein the at least one additive comprises one or more of the following: cationic, anionic, neutral polymers, fibers, microparticles, polymerized aluminum or surfactants.
    [11]
    The process of claim 10, wherein the at least one additive comprises bentonite.
    [12]
    The method of claim 1, wherein the underground formation is a hydrocarbon producing field formation.
    DK 2018 70062 A1
    [13]
    The method of claim 1, wherein the underground formation is an aqueous (e.g. oil-deposited) underground formation.
    DK 2018 70062 A1
    1/3
    DK 2018 70062 A1
    2.3
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    DK180113B1|2020-05-06|Clogging of high permeability areas in underground formations
    EP2398866B1|2015-03-04|Defluidizing lost circulation pills
    RU2600116C2|2016-10-20|Composites for controlled release of well treatment agents
    CA2897497C|2017-08-22|Methods of designing a drilling fluid having suspendable loss circulation material
    CA2701697C|2012-05-15|Compositions and methods for treatment of well bore tar
    EP2524017B1|2015-06-17|Treatment fluids for wetting control of multiple rock types and associated methods
    GB2532529B|2019-07-10|Wellbore fluid containing granular hemicellulose material
    CA2472090C|2009-12-15|Lost circulation compositions comprising resilient carbon and water-swellable polymers
    ES2281814T3|2007-10-01|PERFORATION METHOD
    Mackay et al.2003|PWRI: Scale formation risk assessment and management
    EA022202B1|2015-11-30|Methods and aqueous based wellbore fluids for reducing wellbore fluid loss and filtrate loss
    RU2581070C1|2016-04-10|Using titanium coagulant for treatment of water-flooded oil reservoir
    US3481400A|1969-12-02|Treatment of solids plugged wells with reversibly adsorbable inhibitor
    EA025729B1|2017-01-30|Compositions and methods for treatment of well bore tar
    RU2582197C1|2016-04-20|Drilling mud
    GB2527175A|2015-12-16|Anionic polysaccharide polymers for viscosified fluids
    Berry et al.2012|Cost-effective acid stimulation of carbonates using seawater-based systems without calcium sulfate precipitation
    RU2097538C1|1997-11-27|Method of reducing loss of flooding agent and method of secondary extraction of hydrocarbons
    Leontiev et al.2017|Development and study of peat-humate solutions for drilling and repairing of oil and gas wells
    CA1140740A|1983-02-08|Injection fluid with ph adjusted and saturatedwith calcium and carbonate ions
    US11198811B2|2021-12-14|Multifunctional friction reducers
    RU2710654C1|2019-12-30|Highly inhibited invert drilling agent
    RU2708849C1|2019-12-12|Nanostructured high-inhibited drilling fluid
    Alrabaei et al.2021|Zero-Flaring Mudcake Removal: New Techniques for Efficient Natural Cleanup of Horizontal/Multilateral Open-Hole Wells
    Aleksandrov et al.2018|Selecting a Technology to Increase well Capacity and Enhance Oil Recovery of the YUS11 Formation of the Fainsk Oil Field
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    WO2008119620A1|2008-10-09|
    DK180126B1|2020-05-20|
    DK200900354A|2009-03-13|
    DK180113B1|2020-05-06|
    EP1980604A1|2008-10-15|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    US4002204A|1975-11-13|1977-01-11|Shell Oil Company|Timing the deposition of an asphalt plugging material from an asphalt-cationic emulsion|
    CA2296357C|1997-07-23|2006-07-04|Cleansorb Limited|Methods for deposition of materials in underground reservoirs|
    AU2005254780C1|2004-06-17|2010-01-14|Equinor Energy As|Well treatment|
    GB2419614B|2004-10-29|2006-09-13|Statoil Asa|Well treatment to increase particulate matrix strength|AU2005254781C1|2004-06-17|2009-12-03|Equinor Energy As|Well treatment|
    US9874077B2|2008-04-30|2018-01-23|Altarock Energy Inc.|Method and cooling system for electric submersible pumps/motors for use in geothermal wells|
    WO2009135073A2|2008-04-30|2009-11-05|Altarock Energy, Inc.|System and method for aquifer geo-cooling|
    HUE028944T2|2008-07-07|2017-01-30|Altarock Energy Inc|Enhanced geothermal systems and reservoir optimization|
    WO2010022283A1|2008-08-20|2010-02-25|Altarock Energy, Inc.|A well diversion agent formed from in situ decomposition of carbonyls at high temperature|
    WO2010144872A1|2009-06-12|2010-12-16|Altarock Energy, Inc.|An injection-backflow technique for measuring fracture surface area adjacent to a wellbore|
    US9151125B2|2009-07-16|2015-10-06|Altarock Energy, Inc.|Temporary fluid diversion agents for use in geothermal well applications|
    US8522872B2|2009-10-14|2013-09-03|University Of Utah Research Foundation|In situ decomposition of carbonyls at high temperature for fixing incomplete and failed well seals|
    NO331200B1|2009-12-21|2011-10-31|Temasi As|Procedure for stabilizing sand|
    US10724198B2|2013-10-28|2020-07-28|Arizona Board Of Regents, A Body Corporate Of The State Of Arizona Acting For And On Behalf Of Arizona State University|Mineral precipitation methods|
    GB201322756D0|2013-12-20|2014-02-05|Maersk Olie & Gas|Consolidation of proppant sand in hydraulic fractures|
    MX2019003625A|2016-09-30|2019-07-04|Baker Hughes A Ge Co Llc|Biologically mediated precipitation of carbonates for use in oilfield applications.|
    CN111022020B|2019-12-24|2020-09-22|北京大德广源石油技术服务有限公司|Water-controlling fracturing production-increasing method for oil-gas well|
    法律状态:
    2020-05-06| PME| Patent granted|Effective date: 20200506 |
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    US92162907P| true| 2007-04-03|2007-04-03|
    EP07006901A|EP1980604A1|2007-04-03|2007-04-03|Plugging of high permeability regions of subterranean formations|
    DKPA200900354A|DK180126B1|2007-04-03|2008-03-11|Clogging of high permeability areas in underground formations|
    [返回顶部]